SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicology and Industrial Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, G. E.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, G. E.R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

EEG sensitization during chemical exposure in women with and without chemical sensitivity of unknown etiology

Mercedes Fernandez

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs, Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona

Iris R. Bell

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Affairs, Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona

Gary E.R. Schwartz

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, Department of Neurology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Department Arizona

This study tested the sensitization model proposed by Bell et al. [Bell I.R., Miller C.S. and Schwartz G.E. An olfactory-limbic model of multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: possible relationship to kindling and affective spectrum disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 1992:32:218-242] to study chemical sensitivity. The sensitization model indicates that a pharmacological stimulus or a traumatic event which elicits a strong response can sensitize limbic and/or mesolimbic pathways; and subsequent less intense trauma or stimuli, in the same or different modality, can elicit an amplified response. Three groups of subjects were tested: (1) women who reported chemical sensitivity and no sexual abuse (chemically sensitive, CS); (2) sexually abused (SA) women without chemical sensitivity; and (3) healthy women without chemical sensitivity or sensitivity or sexual abuse history (normal, N). All subjects were exposed to odorant and nonodorous control stimuli once a week for 3 weeks. Electroencephalographic activity was recorded while subjects sniffed the odorant and control stimuli. Results of the study revealed that both the CS and the SA group showed electroencephalogram (EEG) {alpha} sensitization across experimental sessions, while the N group showed little change over time. Additionally, EEG findings revealed that the CS group generated significantly greater {alpha} activity than the other two groups. Finally, while the groups were different on measures of psychological distress, these differences did not diminish the EEG findings. In summary, these findings suggest that intermittent exposure to chemicals elicits sensitization in CS and SA women without chemical sensitivity, supporting our expectations that chemical sensitivity is, in part, a manifestation of time-dependent sensitization (TDS). Additionally, these EEG findings indicate that CS women are unlike SA and healthy women in the amount of EEG {alpha} activity they generate. Finally, these findings indicate that psychological factors as assessed in this study do not explain electrophysiological differences between chemically and non-chemically-sensitive women.

Key Words: chemical intolerance • chemical sensitivity • EEG • MCS • sensitization

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 15, No. 3-4, 305-312 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/074823379901500304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B.-C. Min, S.-H. Jin, I.-H. Kang, D. H. Lee, J. K. Kang, S. T. Lee, and K. Sakamoto
Analysis of Mutual Information Content for EEG Responses to Odor Stimulation for Subjects Classified by Occupation
Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 741 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. L. PALL
NMDA sensitization and stimulation by peroxynitrite, nitric oxide, and organic solvents as the mechanism of chemical sensitivity in multiple chemical sensitivity
FASEB J, September 1, 2002; 16(11): 1407 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
M. Fernandez, G. E.R. Schwartz, and I. R. Bell
Subjective ratings of odorants by women with chemical sensitivity
Toxicology and Industrial Health, July 1, 1999; 15(6): 57 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement