SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicology and Industrial Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linkov, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linkov, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Correlations among tumor types in mouse cancer bioassays: liver adenomas, liver carcinomas, leukemias and lymphomas

Igor Linkov

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Michael Polkanov

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Jefferson Laboratories, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Azat Shagiakhmetov

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Jefferson Laboratories, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Richard Wilson

Department of Physics, Harvard University, Jefferson Laboratories, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

George M. Gray

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02115, ggray{at}hsph.harvard.edu

In an examination of rodent bioassays Young and Gries [Young S.S., and Gries C.L. Exploration of the negative correlation between proliferative hepatocellular lesions and lymphoma in rats and mice—establishment and implications. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1984: 4: 632-640] and Haseman et al. [Haseman J.K., et al. Body weight-tumor incidence correlations in long-term rodent carcinogenicity studies. Toxicol. Pathol. 1997: 25: 256-263] noticed that there is a negative correlation (anticorrelation) between development of liver tumors and leukemia or lymphomas. If an animal has a lymphoma or leukemia it is less likely to develop liver tumors. These studies noted that this applies to several strains of animals. The anticorrelation appeared in control animals. In this paper we study this anticorrelation in the quarter of a million rodents exposed in the Carcinogenesis Bioassay Database System (CBDS) database of the National Toxicology program in both control and dosed animals. We failed to completely replicate Young and Gries or Haseman et al. However, when benign liver tumors (adenomas or nodules) and malignant liver tumors (carcinomas) are considered separately AND different leukemia and lymphoma types are considered, a strong anticorrelation appears. We identify survival and the time period (in years) during which the bioassay was completed as an important factor in interpreting correlations and anticorrelations. Differences between liver adenomas and carcinomas and lymphoma types contribute to a more general question of grouping of the individual tumor types. In our classification scheme (originally developed about 1986 by Dr. Bailar) an effort is made to distinguish benign and malignant neoplasms, while other investigators group all tumors at a specific site. For many analyses liver adenomas and carcinomas have been lumped together. This is because it is suspected that the diagnoses by pathologists may not distinguish, or ignore the (benign) adenoma when a (malignant) carcinoma is present. Possible biological differences in tumor mechanisms may require separate evaluation of these tumors with all the dangers of "pathologist bias" that this introduces.

Key Words: chemical carcinogenesis • rodent • rodent bioassay • liver tumors • leukemia • lymphoma

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 16, No. 1, 16-40 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/074823370001600103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. Keenan, S. Elmore, S. Francke-Carroll, R. Kemp, R. Kerlin, S. Peddada, J. Pletcher, M. Rinke, S. P. Schmidt, I. Taylor, et al.
Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent Lesions
Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2009; 37(5): 679 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
G. M. Gray, I. Linkov, M. Polkanov, and R. Wilson
Liver adenomas and carcinomas: correlations and relationship to body weight in long-term rodent cancer bioassays
Toxicology and Industrial Health, July 1, 2000; 16(6): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement