This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wireman, J. R Articles by Long, G C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wireman, J. R Articles by Long, G C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Communicating risk in diverse communities

Health Risk Assessment Branch, Air Force Institute for Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Risk Analysis, 2513 Kennedy Circle, Brooks AFB, Texas 78235-5116, USA

G Cornell Long

Health Risk Assessment Branch, Air Force Institute for Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Risk Analysis, 2513 Kennedy Circle, Brooks AFB, Texas 78235-5116, USA

Environmental risk communication involves the use of many tools and techniques to form and deliver effective messages. These messages need to inform affected communities about the potential risks and health effects resulting from exposures to environmental contaminants. More importantly, the messages need to reflect the needs, concerns, sensitivities, and knowledge base of the affected community. This risk message is based on profiling, which is simply getting to know your community (demographically, culturally, and historically) and melding this information with scientific knowledge to effectively deliver a message. Three Air Force (AF) case studies are used to discuss how effective risk-communication methods can be utilized in vastly different communities: an on-base residential population, an AF occupational setting, and a remote Alaskan community impacted by historical AF activities. We will discuss the methods used to profile affected communities, determine and deliver messages, and describe the reaction and receptiveness of the community receiving the message.

Key Words: partnering • risk communication • US Air Force

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 17, No. 5-10, 298-301 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/0748233701th103oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?