SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Toxicology and Industrial Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hope, B. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hope, B. K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A spatially and bioenergetically explicit terrestrial ecological exposure model

Bruce K Hope

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 811 SW Sixth Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, USA, hope.bruce{at}deq.state.or.us

In typical exposure models, dose is a function of ingestion rate, which is a function of field metabolic rate and food energy availability. It is implicitly assumed that neither food energy nor ingestion rate is limited. This is unlikely to be true in the field. Poor habitat quality (expressed as limited or lacking food energy) or a physiologically limited maximum ingestion rate may collectively limit energy intake. A receptor may thus be as much at risk from lack of energy as from toxicant effects. To explore this possibility, an existing spatially explicit exposure model (SE3M) was enhanced to: 1) express ‘habitat quality’ in terms of gross energy available from a suite of habitat-specific food types, 2) track fulfillment of a receptor’s daily energy needs as it traverses habitat patches with varying gross energy levels, 3) link intake of contaminants to food consumed to meet daily energy needs, and 4) track contaminant doses and resulting tissue residue levels as a receptor moves through habitat patches with differing levels of contamination. A feedback term through which chemical stressors affect a receptor’s ability to intake and process energy was not considered at this time. The now spatially and energetically explicit exposure model, SE4M, provides a platform for exploring spatial and bioenergetic factors that may influence a receptor’s acquisition of energy and contaminant tissue residues as it moves through space and time. An application of this model would be to provide predictions of tissue residue levels that are accessible to calibration or validation with empirical field data.

Key Words: bioenergetic model • ecological risk assessment • spatially explicit model

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 17, No. 5-10, 322-332 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/0748233701th124oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement