This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Popp, J. A. Articles by Cattley, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Popp, J. A. Articles by Cattley, R. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In Vivo Studies On the Mechanism of Di(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate Carcinogenesis

Department of Experimental Pathology and Toxicology Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Linda K. Garvey

Department of Experimental Pathology and Toxicology Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Russell C. Cattley

Department of Experimental Pathology and Toxicology Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

In a study sponsored by the National Toxicology Program, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) fed in the diet at 1.2% significantly increased the incidence of female rats with hepatocellular carcinomas. Extensive evaluation of DEHP for carcinogenicity has yielded negative results. The present investigations were designed to elucidate the mechanism of DEHP hepatocarcinogenesis under the conditions of the original bioassay.

Short-term studies designed to evaluate the promoting capability of DEHP, when administered after initiation, were negative when livers of female Fischer-344 rats were evaluated using multiple histochemical stains to identify foci of cellular alteration. Two different protocols were used to evaluate the initiating potential of DEHP in the liver using histochemically defined foci as the endpoint. In both experiments the results were negative. Chronic exposure to DEHP at 1.2% in the diet for 2 years resulted in elevation of hepatic peroxisomal enzymes while DNA replication, an indication of cell proliferation, was not affected in hepatocytes. The number of foci was not elevated in the DEHP group compared to the controls, even though a low incidence of rats with liver tumors occurred in the treated group.

The results of this series, as well as other published results, suggest that DEHP and other peroxisomal proliferating chemicals have unique effects on the development of hepatic neoplasms. The absence of altered foci after chronic administration or in initiation-promotion protocols distinguishes DEHP and perhaps other peroxisomal proliferating chemicals from both classic liver carcinogens and promoters.

Key Words: DEHP • hepatocarcinogenesis • initiation-promotion studies • peroxisomal proliferating chemicals.

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 3, No. 2, 151-163 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/074823378700300211


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?