This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schoeny, R. S. Articles by Margosches, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schoeny, R. S. Articles by Margosches, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluating Comparative Potencies: Developing Approaches To Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures

Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio

Elizabeth Margosches

Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

The U. S. EPA must provide guidance as to health risk assessment of mixtures from a variety of sources such as wastewaters, hazard ous waste sites and air particulates. One approach to risk assess ment of mixtures is to add up risk assessments for individual components identified as part of the mixture, after considering the potential for interaction among those components. This provides an index of hazard potential but not a quantitative estimate. When data on mixture components are incomplete, but these components are isomers or congeners of a well-studied chemical, another technique—use of toxic equivalency factors—can be applied. This approach has been proposed for estimating risk associated with chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans. A third approach, that of relative or comparative potency, is based on the assumption that for similar but not necessarily definable complex mixtures, a mea sure of relative potency based on data from in vitro tests can be correlated in a constant fashion with relative potency from an in vivo bioassay.

The degree of confidence in the appropriateness of a relative po tency method rests upon the way potency is measured and the validity of underlying assumptions (the degree to which these assumptions can be tested). One class of assumptions involves cho ice of the model or procedure for deriving the quantitative risk estimates. A second set of assumptions deals with mechanism of action, and whether such considerations add bias or, in fact, refine the relative potency judgment. The choice of short-term tests appropriate for use in establishing the potency relationships is also a factor to be considered. This paper presents examples of pro posed uses of relative potency in risk assessment and outlines some areas for further study.

Key Words: 1. Key words: carcinogen risk assessment • comparative potency • in vitro • bioassay • mixtures • risk assessment.

Toxicology and Industrial Health, Vol. 5, No. 5, 825-837 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/074823378900500518


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?